Jump to content

ok so we all have our fusions, whats your toy?


redfire06
 Share

Recommended Posts

Redfire - My toy was a BMW 5 Series - 5 speed. (hence the E39 in my username)

i sold that a few years ago when I got a Taurus company car. Now I just replaced the Taurus with a Fusion company car.

Meanwhile, I needed something fun so I bought a Triumph Street Triple

 

post-12402-0-84785000-1303879134_thumb.jpg

Edited by SoonerE39
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2005 Mustang OK its a V6 automatic but it runs mid 14s@94 and looks just as good as a GT. I just couldn't bring myself to trade it in when I got the 2011 Milan 2.5L. BUT the way things are going now I don't know. I just might end up selling it. Maybe.

my friend LOVED his v6 auto camaro lol had it for years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Redfire - My toy was a BMW 5 Series - 5 speed. (hence the E39 in my username)

i sold that a few years ago when I got a Taurus company car. Now I just replaced the Taurus with a Fusion company car.

Meanwhile, I needed something fun so I bought a Triumph Street Triple

 

post-12402-0-84785000-1303879134_thumb.jpg

one of my favs. i always wanted a e39 M5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have two Mustangs....my 2000 and my 1991. Both are far from stock and the 1991 is still work in progress. The 2000 is supercharged and the 1991 has an NOS 150hp shot intake plate setup.

 

Here is a video of her running http://s32.photobucket.com/albums/d33/Chris00GT/?action=view&current=576bf1ae.mp4

 

01c197ca.jpg

 

P0000008_edited.jpg

Edited by chris00gt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As usual, I have to be different from the crowd. :headspin: My "toy" is a 2003 GMC 1500 4X4 pickup. Outside it looks like something you'd take fishing or hunting. Under the hood I've stuffed a 6.0 L (364 CID for us old folks) engine, and topped it with a Magnusson MP112 blower. The result is a 0 - 60 time of just under 5.2 seconds. :rockon: Not sure what the 1/4 mile is. I hope to get to the track sometime this summer.

Edited by GreenBlackFFH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As usual, I have to be different from the crowd. :headspin: My "toy" is a 2003 GMC 1500 4X4 pickup. Outside it looks like something you'd take fishing or hunting. Under the hood I've stuffed a 6.0 L (364 CID for us old folks) engine, and topped it with a Magnusson MP112 blower. The result is a 0 - 60 time of just under 5.2 seconds. :rockon: Not sure what the 1/4 mile is. I hope to get to the track sometime this summer.

 

 

pure awesomeness!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My toy is and has been since 1976: 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme. It is all stock with the Rocket V-8 (315HP). Galleon Gold with Gold interior. It has the TIC TOC Tach, Sport Steering Wheel, Rallye I Chrome Wheels, Dual Cut-out Exhaust Bumper, Olds W-31 Posi rear (3.42 gearing). It really sucks-up the Gas, as well as all the other vehicles I have ever owned. It aslo takes Premium, back in 1970 gas was 98 Octane. The Fusion Hybrid is the first vehicle I have ever owned, that was bought with the theory of MPG. I also own a (1999) Ford Expedition, (2003) Ford F-150.

Edited by Fuze-ion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My toy is and has been since 1976: 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme. It is all stock with the Rocket V-8 (315HP). Galleon Gold with Gold interior. It has the TIC TOC Tach, Sport Steering Wheel, Rallye I Chrome Wheels, Dual Cut-out Exhaust Bumper, Olds W-31 Posi rear (3.42 gearing). It really sucks-up the Gas, as well as all the other vehicles I have ever owned. It aslo takes Premium, back in 1970 gas was 98 Octane. The Fusion Hybrid is the first vehicle I have ever owned, that was bought with the theory of MPG. I also own a (1999) Ford Expedition, (2003) Ford F-150.

 

Gasoline back in those days was rated according to the Research Octane Number (RON). When unleaded came out around 1974-ish they switched to an average of the RON and the Motor Octane Number (MON). The resulting number is about 4 to 5 points lower for the same quality gas. So the old 98 RON gas of 1970 would be about like the 93 Octane of today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My toy is and has been since 1976: 1970 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme. It is all stock with the Rocket V-8 (315HP). Galleon Gold with Gold interior. It has the TIC TOC Tach, Sport Steering Wheel, Rallye I Chrome Wheels, Dual Cut-out Exhaust Bumper, Olds W-31 Posi rear (3.42 gearing). It really sucks-up the Gas, as well as all the other vehicles I have ever owned. It aslo takes Premium, back in 1970 gas was 98 Octane. The Fusion Hybrid is the first vehicle I have ever owned, that was bought with the theory of MPG. I also own a (1999) Ford Expedition, (2003) Ford F-150.

 

Thumbs up, fellow Olds fan. Hence, my screen name. We had a 66 Cutlass, 68 442 (authentic) W30, 72 C/S coupe, 72 Hurst Olds, 75 Cutlass Salon coupe, 77 98 Regency. After that I went to FoMoCo :rockon:

 

Last week I attended the annual local Oldsmobile club "spring dust off" show. Lots of beautiful Oldses from all decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of all the cars that I have owned, the one I wished I hadn't sold was my wife's 1971 Cutlass Supreme SX. We spec'd it out and ordered it from the factory with the 455 cu in (4bbl carb), turbohydromatic 400 (with Hurst dual-gate "his and hers" shifter), guage package, etc. It was a 442 (drivetrain and suspension) enclosed in a formal Supreme 2-door body. Posted below is the original window sticker. I wonder what this car would be worth today?

post-4677-0-82099900-1304725384_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of all the cars that I have owned, the one I wished I hadn't sold was my wife's 1971 Cutlass Supreme SX. We spec'd it out and ordered it from the factory with the 455 cu in (4bbl carb), turbohydromatic 400 (with Hurst dual-gate "his and hers" shifter), guage package, etc. It was a 442 (drivetrain and suspension) enclosed in a formal Supreme 2-door body. Posted below is the original window sticker. I wonder what this car would be worth today?

 

You, sir, are obviously a man with discriminating taste. ;) The SX with the performance package was a true sleeper. They were quite rare. Only 1820 coupes were built in 1971. I doubt too many survive. There were 2 beauties at the show I mentioned above. Prices range from about $4g for a basket case up to the mid-$20G range for a nice one, like this one

 

I have diecast model of an SX coupe. That's the closest I'll get to owning one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You, sir, are obviously a man with discriminating taste. ;) The SX with the performance package was a true sleeper. They were quite rare. Only 1820 coupes were built in 1971. I doubt too many survive. There were 2 beauties at the show I mentioned above. Prices range from about $4g for a basket case up to the mid-$20G range for a nice one, like this one

 

I have diecast model of an SX coupe. That's the closest I'll get to owning one.

It was a true sleeper. She ordered it in a medium brown metallic with black buckets and a black vinyl roof. Only the 442 exhaust "trumpets" and the exhaust rumble gave away its potential. However, with approximately 500 lbft of torque, and a 3.08 rear end, it tended to consume rear tires!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...